Which model analyzes the decision-making process of bystanders in emergency situations?

The cost-benefit analysis model is pertinent to the decision-making process of bystanders in emergency situations because it suggests that individuals weigh the potential costs and benefits before deciding how to act. This model posits that bystanders consider factors such as personal risk, social obligations, the likelihood of success, and the expected emotional responses. In crises, individuals may assess whether intervening is worth the risk of harm or social backlash, versus the benefits of helping someone in need. This analytical approach provides insight into why some individuals choose to assist while others may remain passive, highlighting the complexities of human behavior in emergencies.

Other models, such as the General Aggression Model, primarily address aggressive behavior and its influences, while Groupthink focuses more on decision-making in cohesive groups, often leading to poor choices, and Social influence pertains to the ways others affect an individual's behavior in various contexts. Hence, the cost-benefit analysis model stands out for its specific application to emergency situations and bystander behavior.